gfp rac1 t17n (Addgene inc)
Structured Review

Gfp Rac1 T17n, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 17 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/gfp+rac1+t17n/pRK5-myc-Rac1-T17N+(Plasmid+%2312984)/pmc06543538-497-6-12
Average 93 stars, based on 17 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "The trafficking protein JFC1 regulates Rac1-GTP localization at the uropod controlling neutrophil chemotaxis and in vivo migration"
Article Title: The trafficking protein JFC1 regulates Rac1-GTP localization at the uropod controlling neutrophil chemotaxis and in vivo migration
Journal: Journal of leukocyte biology
doi: 10.1002/JLB.1VMA0818-320R
Figure Legend Snippet: (a) The distribution of Rac1-Q61L transfected into primary WT or JFC1−/− neutrophils was analyzed by TIRF microscopy. Upper panels, representative images of unstimulated neutrophils are shown and representative dynamic studies are presented in supplementary movies S5 and S6. Lower panels, representative images of fMLF-stimulated neutrophils are shown. The white arrows point to the uropods of these cells showing accumulation of Rac1-Q61L-GFP in JFC1−/− but not in wild type neutrophils. Scale bars: 5 μm. (b) Immunofluorescence analysis of endogenous JFC1 (red) and Rac1-GTP (green) in neutrophilic-differentiated HL60 cells. Arrowheads indicate examples of vesicles that are positive for both JFC1 and Rac1 at the uropod and back body. Scale bar, 5 μm. (c) Super-resolution microscopy analysis (STORM) of the localization of endogenous JFC1 and Rac1-GTP in neutrophilic-differentialted HL60 cells. JFC1 and Rac1-GTP are detected adjacent to each other (arrowheads <50 nm apart) compatible with putative, in situ, protein-protein interaction; Scale bar, 5 μm. (d) Quantification of the super-resolution microscopy analysis showing the distance between JFC1 and Rac1-GTP centroids was performed as described under “Materials and Methods” and results are expressed as a percentage of total pairs at <50nm distance for each cell. A total of at least 10,000 JFC1 and Rac1-GTP pairs were analyzed from at least 4 individual cells. Mean ± S.E.M, **, p < 0.01, ***, p<0.001.(e) Chemotactic responses of wild type (WT, black bars) or JFC1−/− (red bars) neutrophils in response to the CXC chemokines CXCL2 and KC. Mean ± SEM, n=6 mice analyzed independently in two independent experiments. NS, non-stimulated.
Techniques Used: Transfection, Microscopy, Immunofluorescence, Super-Resolution Microscopy, In Situ
Figure Legend Snippet: (a) Coimmunoprecipitation analysis of the JFC1-Rac1 interaction. Cells were transfected with myc-JFC1 and with either WT Rac1-GFP, the constitutively active Rac1 Q61L-GFP or the dominant negative Rac1 T17N-GFP. Cell lysates were used in pulldown assays, carried out using anti-myc antibodies and magnetic beads. Western blots are representative of at least three experiments with similar results. (b) Densitometric quantification of the immunoprecipitated bands from 3 independent experiments using the ImageJ software. The data is represented as mean ± SEM. ** p< 0.01. (c) Pulldown experiments were performed in cells transfected with GFP-Rac1Q61L with either wild type myc-JFC1 or with the point mutant myc-JFC1-W83S, which lacks binding to Rab27a. (d) Pulldown experiments were performed in cells transfected with EGFP-Rab27a with either myc-JFC1 WT or with the myc-JFC1-W83S mutant.
Techniques Used: Transfection, Dominant Negative Mutation, Magnetic Beads, Western Blot, Immunoprecipitation, Software, Mutagenesis, Binding Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: (a-e) Comparative quantitative analysis of the localization of endogenous active Rac1 in stimulated wild type and JFC1−/− neutrophils. (a) Quantitative analysis of total Rac1-GTP in neutrophils isolated from WT and JFC1−/− mice after stimulation with 100nM fMLF for 10 min at 37 °C. Active Rac1 was quantified using an antibody specific for the GTP bound form of Rac1 as described under “Material and Methods” and Rac1-GTP fluorescence intensity in the whole cell was analyzed using ImageJ. The data is indicated as mean± SEM of the arbitrary fluorescent units from an n=3 mice. (b) Representative images of WT and JFC1−/− cells showing Rac1-GTP accumulation in the tail upon fMLF stimulation for 10 min. (c) The length of Rac1-GTP uropods was analyzed using the ImageJ software. The data is expressed as mean ± SEM from a total of 180 cells from 3 independent experiments. (d) The % of total Rac1-GTP accumulated in the tail for each cell was calculated from the fluorescent intensity of Rac1-GTP in the uropod relative to the whole cell, measured using the ImageJ software. (e) The tail area was measured and Rac1 tail intensity per unit area was calculated using ImageJ. (c-e). WT (black circles); JFC1−/− (red triangles). Data are represented as mean ± SEM and were obtained from an n=4 mice. *** p<0.001, **** p<0.0001. (f-k) Effects of microtubule disruption (f-h) or ROCK inhibition (i-k) on the distribution of endogenous active Rac1 in WT neutrophils. Isolated neutrophils were seeded onto glass coverslips for 30 min, treated with the indicated inhibitors and stimulated with 100nM fMLF for 10 min at 37 °C. Active Rac1 was quantitatively analyzed by confocal microscopy as described above. (f) Representative image of WT and JFC1−/− cells showing Rac1-GTP accumulation in the tail upon treatment with 10μM Nocadozole followed by fMLF stimulation. (g) Percentage of total cells expressing Rac1-GTP-positive tails. (h) % of total (whole cell) Rac1-GTP accumulated in the tail for each Nocodazole- or vehicle-treated cell. (i) Representative images of WT and JFC1−/− cells showing Rac1-GTP accumulation in the tail upon treatment with 10μM Y27632 prior to fMLF stimulation. (j) The length of the Rac1-GTP tails in vehicle vs Y27632-treated cells. The data is expressed as mean ± SEM obtained from 3 independent experiments. (k) Percentage of total Rac1-GTP accumulated at the uropods of Y27632 or vehicle treated cells. n=3 mice. Mean ± SEM. (l) Quantitative analysis of RhoA activity in wild type (WT) and JFC1−/− neutrophils that have been left untreated (NS) or stimulated with fMLF for 30 seconds (30”) or for 3 minutes (3’). Mean ± SEM, n=3. *, p<0.05.
Techniques Used: Isolation, Fluorescence, Software, Disruption, Inhibition, Confocal Microscopy, Expressing, Activity Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: A schematic representation showing a proposed model for the sequence of events in a WT vs a JFC1−/− neutrophil. In a WT neutrophil the interaction of JFC1 with Rac1-GTP allows trafficking of Rac1-GTP, thus preventing its accumulation in the uropod and allowing for RhoA cyclic activation and subsequent tail retraction (left panel). In contrast, in a JFC1−/− neutrophil, Rac1-GTP, a proposed negative regulator of RhoA (52) but also suggested to positively regulate uropod-localized RhoA activity (13), accumulates in the uropod, affecting RhoA-activation-deactivation cycling, and causing increased uropod length and thus impaired directional migration (right panel).
Techniques Used: Sequencing, Activation Assay, Activity Assay, Migration
Related Articles
Expressing:Article Title: The trafficking protein JFC1 regulates Rac1-GTP localization at the uropod controlling neutrophil chemotaxis and in vivo migration Article Snippet: .. Expression vectors: GFP- Rac1 WT, GFP- Rac1 Q61L, Generated:Article Title: The trafficking protein JFC1 regulates Rac1‐GTP localization at the uropod controlling neutrophil chemotaxis and in vivo migration Article Snippet: .. GFP-Rac1WT, GFP-Rac1 Q61L, |

